tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14749639.post114688608373303200..comments2023-11-19T20:48:24.198-08:00Comments on Frankly dear, I don't give a damn: Mission Impossible III - Movie Reviewnmageshhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07567172144068196991noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14749639.post-1147119115520546132006-05-08T13:11:00.000-07:002006-05-08T13:11:00.000-07:00I agree. I think hiring J.J.Abrams to do this movi...I agree. I think hiring J.J.Abrams to do this movie was a big mistake. He is a sappy director and makes sappiness interesting. For a period of 1 or 2 years, David Fincher (The Game, Seven) was attached to do MI-3. Now, he could have taken it to the next level and made it darker and far more interesting, with Cruise's influence a little less obvious. Thinking back, there was too much Cruise present in it all. Even when he was not on screen, his presence was threateningly imminent. <BR/><BR/>As far as this movie is concerned, I did not feel bored and it just about worked for me.nmageshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07567172144068196991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14749639.post-1147113094228084932006-05-08T11:31:00.000-07:002006-05-08T11:31:00.000-07:00Great to have you back. This film didn't work for ...Great to have you back. This film didn't work for me. In fact I am so indifferent that I don't even feel like arguing against its shortcomings. And what in the world is PSH doing in a mess like this? He did try his best though.<BR/>Once upon a time I thought Cruise was a good actor (Jerry Maguire). However, the more I see of him, I don't detect any variation at all. He lacks the range which someone like Tom Hanks as. He is still good, but he'll never be great.Riteshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03848387800240891348noreply@blogger.com